Posted in Political Theory, tagged Article One of the United States Constitution, Bill of Rights, Congress, Constitution, Federal government of the United States, Gun Control, Liberty, Louis William Rose, Right to Bear Arms, Second Amendment, United States, United States Constitution, United States Supreme Court on September 14, 2013|
5 Comments »
“Among other evils which being unarmed brings you, it causes you to be despised.” – Niccolo Machiavelli
The question of whether citizens in a democracy should have ready access to firearms suggests a more basic question, which has often been asked within the memory of man, usually by elitists and autocrats. It is, “Just who the Hell do you think you are?” Here then, a brief answer. I am an adult male; a sovereign political entity; a creation of the living God. I believe that God has endowed me with rights.
The Declaration of Independence agrees with this and that is why that I condescend to pledge allegiance to the United States of America. The Constitution or the government of the United States does not grant rights to me. The ninth amendment clearly recognizes this truth when it states, “The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.” Indeed, I continue to maintain my rights if the Constitution or the United States ceases to exist. I am entitled to these rights even if I live under the subjugation of a cruel tyrant or a totalitarian government.
It is up to the individual to defend their rights by exercising them, by seeing them codified into law, by petitioning, protesting, or performing acts of civil disobedience when government attempts to curtail them. In the extreme, these rights are to be protected by using any means necessary, up to and including the taking of life or the sacrificing of one’s own.
Read Full Post »
Posted in Political Theory, tagged Adventures of Jonathan Gullible, Jacksonville City Council, Liberty, Louis William Rose, Politics, Presidents, Property, Republican, Republican Liberty Caucus, RLCNEF, Slavery, Taxes, United States, Virginia Beach on October 6, 2010|
10 Comments »
Transcript of the the remarks* given to the Jacksonville City Council on Tuesday, September 28, 2010, by Louis William Rose regarding the proposal to increase taxes.
Thank you Mr. President and members of the council. My name is Louis William Rose and I stand for Liberty and the Republican Liberty Caucus.
Today I’d like to talk to you briefly on the idea of liberty and taxes. (more…)
Read Full Post »
Posted in Political Theory, tagged climate change, Communitarianism, Global governance, Global State, ICANN, Louis William Rose, New World Order, One-World Government, Peter Singer, United Nations, United States, World Bank, World Empire, World Trade Organization on September 1, 2010|
46 Comments »
“God grant that not only the love of liberty but a thorough knowledge of the rights of man may pervade all the nations of the earth, so that a philosopher may set his foot anywhere on its surface and say: “This is my country.” -Benjamin Franklin, letter to David Hartley, M.P. December 4, 1789
History of Global Governance
At the pinnacle of its power, in 117 A.D., the Roman Empire exercised control over 2.5 million square miles of real estate surrounding the Mediterranean Sea. Another three-hundred and sixty years would pass before the Achaemenid Empire of Persia could lay claim to a greater one. Still, both of them added together pale in comparison to the British Empire of 1922 which lasted for a century and still holds the “world” record with 458 million people and 14.2 million square miles, about a quarter of the earth’s total land area.
Caligula, Genghis Khan, William the Conqueror, Ivan the Terrible, Napoleon, Hitler, Stalin and hundreds of others, both individuals and states, have at one point in history laid claim to what they thought would be an ever increasing control of the world and its people. Some even justified themselves by saying that it was their aim to make the world a better place, or like Generalissimo Franco and Marshal Tito were heralded as benevolent dictators. Nevertheless, Aesop has taught us well that “The tyrant will always find a pretext for his tyranny.”1 There is no argument that I have encountered that should cause me to believe that the characters and motives of those who presently advocate for global government are any less flawed. Nor am I prepared to discount Lord Acton’s admonition that “[a]ll power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely.”2
Read Full Post »
Posted in Environmental Philosophy, General Interest, Political Theory, tagged Adam, Ayn Rand, Committee of Correspondence, environmental policy, Louis William Rose, Property, property rights, Samuel Adams, Thomas Hobbes, United States on March 3, 2010|
4 Comments »
Indeed, the principal reason why, in the first place, states and cities were ever organized at all was to defend private property. – Cicero 1
In 1772, shortly before the beginning of the Revolutionary War, Samuel Adams, who was a member of the Committee of Correspondence to the Boston Town Meeting, wrote the following:
Among the natural rights of the colonists are these: first, the right to life; secondly, to liberty; thirdly, to property; together with the right to support and defend them in the best manner they can. Those are evident branches of, rather than deductions from, the duty of self-preservation, commonly called the first law of nature.2
Adams and the other founders of our constitutional republic felt strongly that the right to property is a fundamental part of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Nevertheless, it seems reasonable that even those who go as far as to deny the validity of eminent domain must acknowledge that to the extent the individual use of property affects other members of the community, both immediately and in the future, the community develops a legitimate interest in that use. Environmental public policy attempts to manage that interest, but is often a blunt and ineffective instrument due to a lack of scientific understanding about the long-term effects of such policies, and because of the political and financial self-interests that often drive them. This essay addresses the political and moral implications associated with the restriction of personal liberty and property rights by government that may be deemed necessary in the name of environmental protection.
Read Full Post »
Posted in Christianity, Political Theory, tagged Christ, Christianity, Democratic Party (United States), First Amendment to the United States Constitution, God, Louis William Rose, Natural Law, Politics, Religion, Republican Liberty Caucus, Separation of Church and State, United States on December 21, 2009|
Leave a Comment »
Originally published in the Jacksonville Observer
It is impossible to keep religion out of politics. Why, you ask? Because a few folks involved in politics actually know God, and others have strong religious beliefs that supersede and drive their political agenda.
Our religious beliefs may have everlasting significance. In comparison, the history of the United States spans less than three-hundred years. Our First Amendment right of religious liberty ensures that each man and woman has the right to seek the truth about the existence of God without interference from the government. Our First Amendment right of freedom of association recognizes that we join with like-minded individuals in order to ensure that our political, social, religious, and philosophical beliefs will prevail. This is the essence of politics
Read Full Post »