… a conference at FSU this weekend, March 3rd and 4th. Details are available here.
– Rico Vitz
Advertisements
Virtue and Social Diversity
March 2, 2007 by Rico Vitz
Posted in Conferences, Ethics, News & Notes, Political Theory | 2 Comments
2 Responses
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Steph on On Plato’s “Symposium”
- Plato’s Symposium ( The Supper) | Freedom for Cetaceans on On Plato’s “Symposium”
- - NAJSMJEŠNIJE SLIKE NA NETU ! | dane123axa on On Plato’s “Symposium”
- On Global Socioeconomic Justice | on On Global Socioeconomic Justice
- A Neo-Patriarchal Response to Communitarianism | on A Neo-Patriarchal Response to Communitarianism
- GoogleDoodleCollection | Friedrich Nietzsche animated Google Doodle on Nietzsche’s Conclusion
- A Mugwump on Understanding Being and Time
- gas water heater on Bioethics Conference
- Philosophers’ Carnival #155 | Blogging the End on The Elenchus and Socrates’ Idea of the Philosophical Life
- John Jones on Gun Control and the Right to Bear Arms
Categories
- Action Theory
- Aesthetics
- Ancient Philosophy
- Asian Philosophy
- Bioethics
- Buddhism
- Business Ethics
- CFPs
- Christianity
- Comparative Philosophy
- Conferences
- Continental Philosophy
- Early Modern Philosophy
- Environmental Philosophy
- Epistemology
- Ethics
- Experimental Philosophy
- Feminist Philosophy
- General Interest
- Grad School
- Hermeneutics
- Hinduism
- Interviews
- Islam
- Job Market
- Judaism
- Late Modern Philosophy
- Latin American Philosophy
- Logic
- Medieval Philosophy
- Metaphysics
- Moral Psychology
- Naturalism
- News & Notes
- Phenomenology
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Language
- Philosophy of Law
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Mind
- Philosophy of Psychiatry
- Philosophy of Psychology
- Philosophy of Religion
- Philosophy of Science
- Political Theory
- Pragmatism
- Race and Gender
- Social Philosophy
- Teaching Philosophy
- Uncategorized
Blog Stats
- 579,726 hits
Advertisements
After reviewing the abstracts and the conference itinerary I wanted to comment on the morning session of March 3rd. Anytime I see the words “Social Diversity” I know that, as a heterosexual white male, this “diversity” does not include me. Never have I read anywhere someone proclaiming that more heterosexual white males are needed for diversity’s sake. The point being is that I immediately expected bias in the conference material and I was not disappointed upon reading the abstracts of the morning session.
Considering the morning session is about race and racial identity it is then appropriate to note the racial identities of the speakers. Professor Blum is Jewish and a noted author on racism. Bernard Boxill is Black and an author on Black racial interests. Shelley Burtt, I suspect, is a White female. Sophia Wong is an Asian female. Note no White males are involved in the morning discussion on race and civic virtues.
What can be deduce from the abstracts?
Prof Blum claims there are significant differences among the races and ethnicities as social identities when it comes to the civic point of view. After sifting out the intellectual fluff from the abstract we find that the jest of Prof Blum’s morning speech will apparently be this:
Different races/ethnicities have different civic moral standards and we should not promote a “one size fits all” standard. In addition, it is “civically virtuous” to promote the racial interests of Blacks.
This is pretty much what he is getting at even though he veils it in wording such as “racial justice” and “civic tasks”. Considering the respondent is a Black Professor who has written on Black racial interests I believe my assessment is correct.
Shelley Burtt will speak next and part of her speech will deal with how civically virtuous it is for American families to form multiracial families through international adoption. It seams that Dr. Burtt is not choosing sides and encompasses all Americans regardless of race as those who should take initiative in forming multiracial families. Unfortunately, I have this nagging feeling that what Dr. Burtt really wants is just for White families to adopt outside of their race. A far fetched assumption? No.
I see the bulk of the morning session as an attempt to infuse the self-righteousnesses of morality with the pursuit of the multiracial agenda.
CJ [EDITORIAL NOTE: name withheld at the request of the author]
CJ [EDITORIAL NOTE: name withheld at the request of the author of the previous comment]
What is the “multiracial agenda”?