Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Moral Psychology’ Category

Congratulations to FSPB contributor Jen Zamzow (Arizona) on the publication of her article, “Variations in Ethical Intuitions,” in Philosophical Issues! Here is the abstract:
Philosophical theorizing is often, either tacitly or explicitly, guided by intuitions about cases. However, recent empirical work has suggested that philosophically significant intuitions are variable and unstable in a number of [...]

Read Full Post »

Here are the last of the abstracts for the conference’s concurrent sessions. Abstracts of the plenary sessions will follow next week.

Read Full Post »

Here are abstracts of the papers for the conference’s first concurrent sessions. Over the course of the next week, I’ll post the abstracts both for the other concurrent sessions and for the plenary sessions, as well.

Read Full Post »

I though this might be relevant for those working on Environmental Ethics, Philosophy of Religion, and/or Moral Psychology. Best of Luck!

Read Full Post »

… featuring FSU’s Al Mele, here.
(HT: The Garden of Forking Paths)

Read Full Post »

Congratulations to Eric Schwitzgebel (UC-Riverside) and Josh Rust (Stetson) on their forthcoming paper in Mind, “The Moral Behavior of Ethicists: Peer Opinion.” The ‘peer opinion’ is not particularly flattering. Here is the abstract:

Read Full Post »

An interview at Philosophy Bites:
Testimonial injustice occurs when others fail to treat you seriously as a source of knowledge. In this interview Miranda Fricker, author of a recent book on the topic, explains this concept which lies at the intersection between epistemology and political philosophy.
This interview is from 2007, but I just found out about [...]

Read Full Post »

At The Situationist. Here’s a snippet:
To be sure, King is most revered in some circles for quotations that are easily construed as dispositionist, such as: “I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by [...]

Read Full Post »

Congratulations to the students whose papers have been accepted for presentation at the 12th Annual Northeast Florida Student Philosophy Conference at UNF on February 7th:
“How to Motivate the Maxim that ‘Ought Implies Can’ to Defend the Principle of Alternate Possibilities”
Sean Armil (University of Florida)
“On the Limitations of Formal Methods”
Wataru Asanuma (Florida State University)
“A Defense of [...]

Read Full Post »

Joshua Knobe (UNC-Chapel Hill) and Alison Gopnik (UC-Berkeley) talk about how children think, about scientific thinking, and plenty more!
Note: Further commentary at the Splintered Mind.

Read Full Post »

The Milgram Experiment is standard in psychology classes and a hypothesis Stanley Milgram raised has been increasingly taken up and examined by philosophers, “[O]ften it is not so much the kind of person a man as the kind of situation in which he finds himself that determines how he will act.” This hypothesis, the situationist [...]

Read Full Post »

It’s a flurry of podcasts! Here’s information about the conference these podcasts come from:
“Cognitive Disability: A Challenge to Moral Philosophy” will explore philosophical questions about three specific populations — people with autism, Alzheimer’s disease, and those labeled “mentally retarded.” We will raise ethical and foundational questions regarding both theoretical and practical matters. The areas to [...]

Read Full Post »

Via In Socrates’ Wake, I find this psychological gem:
[C]ognitive science offers some fairly sobering observations about our ability to judge ourselves and others…
[T]wo Cornell psychologists began with the following assumptions.
1. Incompetent individuals tend to overestimate their own level of skill.
2. Incompetent individuals fail to recognize genuine skill in others.
3. Incompetent individuals fail to recognize the [...]

Read Full Post »

Mark Schroeder (USC) discusses his book Slaves of the Passions.

Read Full Post »

Via Eric Schwitzgebel I learn of what is quite possibly the best study ever, simply because it uses fart spray so awesomely. However, this sort of study is interesting for reasons beyond the creative use of fart spray.
As I’ve previously noted, explicit use of disgust-based arguments are often found in popular moral and legal debates, [...]

Read Full Post »

Below are youtube links to a lecture Williams gave in 2002 at Princeton entitled “Unavoidable Human Prejudice.” In it, Williams discusses speciesism, Singer’s utilitarianism and the unavoidable human prejudice.

Read Full Post »

Interesting stuff right here.

Read Full Post »

Recent debates in ethics and moral psychology have attempted to call into question the foundations of virtue theory by using empirical research from the social sciences. The situationists claim that virtue theory is empirically inadequate because although people’s behavior can be consistent in similar situations, it is often not consistent across different types of situations. [...]

Read Full Post »

Well, no, I don’t. But apparently some people do!
(HT: Philosophy Sucks!)

Read Full Post »

Here is an interesting post on the relationship between “emotions and moral decision making.”
Maybe this explains why I could never quite get Utilitarianism…
~Q
UPDATE (11/08/2007): Moving to the front from earlier this week. The SUNY-Buffalo blog — the source of the post — has moved recently. We’ve updated the link. Check it out.

Read Full Post »

Class is officially in session for the 53rd Philosophers‘ Carnival!
Since we at the Florida Student Philosophy Blog have recently returned to class, we thought you should too. We would like to thank all those who submitted, and we hope that you find the current selection as engaging as we did. Courses (or posts if you [...]

Read Full Post »

Here is an interview with Nora Volkow on NPR’s Fresh Air. Volkow is director of the National Institute on Drug Abuse and she has done very interesting work on drug abuse.

Read Full Post »

… a conference in honor of Ramon M. Lemos at the University of Miami, Friday, April 27th. Details are available here.
- Rico Vitz

Read Full Post »

Prepping for class, I came across this interesting passage in Reid’s Essays on the Active Powers of the Human Mind (IV.4):
God’s moral perfection doesn’t consist in his having no power to act badly. [...] God’s moral perfection consists in this: having an irresistible power to do everything, he exercises it only in doing what is [...]

Read Full Post »

… here and here, compliments of our friends at R-P-E.
There are also interesting discussions for students both of Le Guin’s “The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas” as well as of brain damage and moral reasoning.
- Rico Vitz

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »